Goods article, in terms of presenting the data and critiquing the climate denial "movement". But almost depressingly disappointing in the way it nosedived into a sales pitch at the very end, with fuzzy math and false equivalencies.
There's no doubt a strong argument to be made for "air capture" (in fact, it's a concept I've wondered about myself), it certainly seems like it must be preferable to geo-engineering. But, how exactly does it work? What kind of waste (upstream and downstream) does it generate? And so on. _______________________________________________ Sustainablelorgbiofuel mailing list Sustainablelorgbiofuel@lists.sustainablelists.org http://lists.eruditium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel
