Well, In ArtificialMemory, I have implemented an Issue-base Information System (http://www.artificialmemory.net/artificialmemory.aspx?ID=17888VT) ontology some years ago. But, by now, I think that in order to represent a discussion it is far more important to have a speech act ontology and to support the individually consistent expression of real and unreal statements. Besides others.
:-) Lars Ludwig ---------------------------------------------------------------------- // Message: 1 // Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 18:31:49 +0100 // From: Christoph LANGE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> // Subject: [swikig] Cicero [Re: Argumentative (= semantic) discussions // now in IkeWiki and SWiM] // To: swikig@aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de // Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> // Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" // // Dear semantic wiki community, // // about one month ago I announced the implementation of argumentative // discussions using the DILIGENT argumentation ontology in IkeWiki on this list. // So far I thought that, besides the system presented in ? // // > C. Tempich, E. Simperl, M. Luczak, R. Studer, and H. S. Pinto. // > Argumentation- based ontology engineering. IEEE Intelligent Systems, // > 22(6):52?59, 2007. _______________________________________________ swikig mailing list swikig@aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de http://www.aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de/mailman/listinfo/swikig
