Hey Klaus, I am surprised you are surprised.
Why would one *not* want to scan your particular home network? IPv6 is on the rise and scanning networks / IPs is a standard thing in the IPv4 world. So it would be a surprise to me, why people would not want to at least try to find devices in IPv6 based networks. Best, Nico Klaus Ethgen <klaus+swi...@ethgen.de> writes: > Hi, > > Currently I see day long IPv6 scans from networks of Akamai > (2a02:26f0:f3::/48), Google (2a00:1450:4000::/37), Apple > (2a01:110::/31), Microsoft (2a01:b740::/29), Swisscom (2001:918::/32) > and Init7 (2001:1620::/32) to my Network @HOME. They all try to > enumerate hosts and ports in 2a02:168:4e82:0:* that does not and never > have exists. > > The net is a fiber7 port. > > Anybody an idea what is going on here? On request I can provide more > informations like pcaps. > > The scans are sourced from all over that mentioned networks above. > > While I have no scruples to block Apple, Microsoft, Akamai or other bad > behaving networks, I do not want to block Swisscom or Init7 if not > needed. > > Needless to say that I do not have any public service behind my fiber7 > port. > > Gruß > Klaus -- Modern, affordable, Swiss Virtual Machines. Visit www.datacenterlight.ch _______________________________________________ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
