---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Ian Stuart <ian.stu...@ed.ac.uk> Date: 19 January 2011 21:44 Subject: Re: content negotiating for package formats To: techadvisorypa...@swordapp.org
On 19/01/11 08:06, Richard Jones wrote: > > and your content negotiation header says: > > Accept: A; q=1.0, B; q=0.8 > Accept-Packaging: Z; q=1.0, X; q=1.0 > > Which combination do you return? I agree its not a clear-cut case..... however it also has to be said that the content negotiation header isn't helping by declaring two options to be of equal "value" I would say: A+Z, then A+X, then B+Z, then B+X .... FIFO-style (after all, if you have a preference for order, try: Accept-Packaging: X; q=1.0, Z; q=1.0 instead) Even under the concept of a combined Accept model, what do you do when you receive Accept-Media-Feature: A(Z); q=1.0, A(X); q=1.0, B(Z); q=0.8, B(X); q=0.8 -- Ian Stuart. Developer: Open Access Repository Junction and OpenDepot.org Bibliographics and Multimedia Service Delivery team, EDINA, The University of Edinburgh. http://edina.ac.uk/ This email was sent via the University of Edinburgh. The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in Scotland, with registration number SC005336. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Special Offer-- Download ArcSight Logger for FREE (a $49 USD value)! Finally, a world-class log management solution at an even better price-free! Download using promo code Free_Logger_4_Dev2Dev. Offer expires February 28th, so secure your free ArcSight Logger TODAY! http://p.sf.net/sfu/arcsight-sfd2d _______________________________________________ Sword-app-techadvisorypanel mailing list Sword-app-techadvisorypanel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sword-app-techadvisorypanel
