Familie von Kaehne wrote: > Troy A. Griffitts wrote: >> Multiple Module Repositories allow both factions of preference to >> proceed forward. > > > I can agree with this. I still maintain that the slowness of throughput > through [EMAIL PROTECTED] is a serious problem right now. > > It is more of a problem as the role of the alternative repositories is > not acknowledged in the official website. > > I suggest a all round acceptable solution would be to be lot clearer on > the website etc regarding the role of the CrossWire repository as a > (OSIS/TEI) standard setter, but also state explicitely that acceptance > of new modules into this repo can and will occasionally take significant > amounts of time + direct those who simply want a module up (in whatever > form) in a public and mainstream repo should contact xyz.
This sounds good. > > I also suggest that we add some wiki pages on how to create and maintain > your own repo. Boy, if you could do this Peter, it would be a great help. I did address this question yesterday or the day before, but nobody responded to it. > > I am happy to do both jobs, though would probably pester you with some > technical questions. > > I also would require write access to the relevant parts of the main > website. I could also work on the main page and do some clean up there > (removing/changing links to dead projects, adding links to living ones) > > Peter > > > _______________________________________________ > sword-devel mailing list: [email protected] > http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel > Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page > -- PMBX license 1502 _______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: [email protected] http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
