On Nov 9, 2010, at 3:38 AM, David Haslam wrote: > > Hi DM, > > Glad you had a good trip. > > Thanks for helpful explanation. > > My Cambridge University Press edition of the AV has both the Hebrew letters > and the English transliterations. > > Unlike your Scofield edition, "THIS BIBLE IS PUBLISHED BY THE CAMBRIDGE > UNIVERSITY PRESS, THE QUEEN'S PRINTER, UNDER ROYAL LETTERS PATENT".
That's good, but that doesn't make it less different from the 1769 version than the Old Scofield. In doing research, I found that there were several versions of the KJV in circulation today all claiming to be the same. In order to be consistent I settled on a single hard copy/dead tree edition. > > Reminder: Our KJV module does not claim to be the 1611, but rather the 1769. > See our > http://crosswire.org/wiki/EnduserFAQ#Do_you_have_the_original_King_James.2FAuthorized_Version.3F > FAQ . Yes. I was curious what the "original had". Interesting to me, the chapters of the Psalmes were in roman numerals. DM > > David > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://sword-dev.350566.n4.nabble.com/Psalm-119-stanza-headings-tp3031104p3033301.html > Sent from the SWORD Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > sword-devel mailing list: [email protected] > http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel > Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page _______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: [email protected] http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
