In the OSIS 2.1 Users Manual, for the milestone element only three attribute names are mentioned: type, n, marker
The osisRef attribute is currently defined only for the following OSIS elements: catchWord, chapter, div, figure, note, q, reference If we wish to enhance the CrossWire updated OSIS schema, the request should be added as a new subsection in this wiki page: https://wiki.crosswire.org/OSIS_211_CR What does the Uighur translation team envisage as the practical use of osisRef in the OSIS example given? What would we expect SWORD to do with it? Best regards, David Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email. ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On Thursday, 13 September 2018 10:01, Peter von Kaehne <[email protected]> wrote: > Deal all, > > I am in the process of uploading an update to our cyrillic Uygyur > module. > > There are a few instances where the new text does not validate due to > use of osisRef in the milestone element. The author asserts that > osisRef should be possible inside the milestone element and I can not > see any reason indeed why it should not - other than "the schema does > not allow it". Below an example. The textual background is a manuscript > anomaly in Romans 14 and 16, where a couple of verses appear commonly > at the end of Romans 16, but in some manuscript in Romans 14. > > 30965 <verse osisID="Rom.14.23 Rom.14.24 Rom.14.25 Rom.14.26" > sID="Rom.14.23 Rom.14.24 Rom.14.25 Rom.14.26" type="x-vsys- > fitted"/><milestone type="x-vsys-verse-start" annotateRef="Rom.14.23" > annotateType="x-vsys-source"/>Лекин бирәр йемәкликкә шәк кәлтүрүп > туруп, йәнә шу йемәкликни йегән киши вижданиниң әйиплишигә учрайду. > Чүнки у киши өзи йегән йемәкликниң тоғра екәнлигигә ишәнч қилалмиди. > Тоғра екәнлигигә ишәнч йоқ һалда қилинған һәр қандақ иш > гунадур.</p><milestone type="x-vsys-movedto" annotateRef="Rom.16.25" > annotateType="x-vsys-source" osisRef="Rom.14.24"/><milestone type="x- > vsys-movedto" annotateRef="Rom.16.26" annotateType="x-vsys-source" > osisRef="Rom.14.25"/><milestone type="x-vsys-movedto" > annotateRef="Rom.16.27" annotateType="x-vsys-source" > osisRef="Rom.14.26"/><verse eID="Rom.14.23 Rom.14.24 Rom.14.25 > Rom.14.26" type="x-vsys-fitted"/><milestone type="x-vsys-verse-end" > annotateRef="Rom.14.23" annotateType="x-vsys-source"/> > > Any views? Should the schema be updated or should I reject the module > in its current form? > > Peter > > sword-devel mailing list: [email protected] > http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel > Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page _______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: [email protected] http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
