> > I expected the order of reports to be from youngest to oldest. I'm > > pretty sure I wrote that in the docs originally, but it's not there now. > > I still think that order would make sense. > > Yes, definitely. If it is neither in the spec nor the documentation, > then we need to add that. Yongsheng is currently working in this aspect, > see MB #8049. Yes, it's a bug. Currently the order is reversed incorrectly. I'll fix it soon.
Cheers, Yongsheng > -----Original Message----- > From: syncevolution-boun...@syncevolution.org > [mailto:syncevolution-boun...@syncevolution.org] On Behalf Of Patrick Ohly > Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2009 3:20 PM > To: Jussi Kukkonen > Cc: SyncEvolution > Subject: Re: [SyncEvolution] questions about sync reports > > On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 07:13 +0000, Jussi Kukkonen wrote: > > I expected the order of reports to be from youngest to oldest. I'm > > pretty sure I wrote that in the docs originally, but it's not there now. > > I still think that order would make sense. > > Yes, definitely. If it is neither in the spec nor the documentation, > then we need to add that. Yongsheng is currently working in this aspect, > see MB #8049. > > > -- > Best Regards, Patrick Ohly > > The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although > I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way > represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak > on behalf of Intel on this matter. > > > _______________________________________________ > SyncEvolution mailing list > SyncEvolution@syncevolution.org > http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list SyncEvolution@syncevolution.org http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution
