It is a burning issue if the internet-drafts editor refuses to publish the document because the copyright does not have the current year. And I have no intention of debating this rule.
dbh > -----Original Message----- > From: Jon Callas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 4:52 PM > To: Alexander Clemm ((alex)) > Cc: David Harrington; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Syslog] Note to editors > > > On Mar 13, 2007, at 11:17 AM, Alexander Clemm ((alex)) wrote: > > > David, > > > > I am using the xml2rfc tool, which inserts these automatically. > > However, the copyright statement does show 2006, not 2007, when I > > generate the draft now. > > > > What would you like to do? It seems preferrable that IETF > should get > > xml2rfc updated. > > > > Given that copyright law says that the copyright is valid for the > life of the authors plus 75 years on a document with a lifespan of > six months, this is not a burning issue. > > Jon > > _______________________________________________ Syslog mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog
