On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 11:21:58AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Fri, 15.06.12 20:06, Bryan Kadzban (br...@kadzban.is-a-geek.net) wrote: > > dbus > > libcap > > I am quite happy with depending on these two as it makes little sense to > build an OS without it, unless you go super minimal in which case > sysemd/udev are not relevant.
For embedded distros udev without systemd is a very real usecase. > > m4 > > intltool > > gperf (--enable-keymap will require gperf for a udev build as well) > > These are only build-time deps, and hence are totally OK to have. I don't care about these. But cross-compiling dbus when it's not actually wanted or needed is not ok. > I mean, the next thing you come up with is a patch to not require > automake and use only make, just because you have a problem with > dependencies? I mean, seriously. This is uncalled for. Depending on a good build-system is ok. But it was clearly stated that using udev without systemd will still be possible. I don't see why it should not be possible to build udev without systemd and therefore any extra dependencies. Regards, Michael -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel