On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 12:48:51PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote: > On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 8:41 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > <zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 12:31:24AM -0800, Lukas Nykryn wrote: > >> man/crypttab.xml | 2 -- > >> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) > >> > >> New commits: > >> commit 517dcac840fe8d5bf30a05c0084eff219af10a4a > >> Author: Lukas Nykryn <lnyk...@redhat.com> > >> Date: Mon Nov 25 09:31:09 2013 +0100 > >> > >> Revert "man: suggest using hash= atribut for swap in example" > >> > >> This reverts commit fa7abba2328eb2d23a7e27708f86f5013059ddcf. > > Reason? > > Systemd upstream will not mention outdated and weak cryptography, or > broken standards. Oh, OK, I guess I could have figured this out OK.
@Lukas: nevertheless, a commit message would still be useful, both on the original commit, and on the revert. Commiters from Brno are too often economical with words :) Zbyszek _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel