On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 10:53 PM, Tom Gundersen <t...@jklm.no> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 2:41 AM, Lennart Poettering <lenn...@poettering.net> > wrote:
>> To follow the naming scheme of the other libs we should probably call >> this "sd-asyncs.c", and the header file should be in src/systemd/ >> together with the other public APIs. > > Hm, the fact that this is async is sort of a detail, is it not? I > mean, all our libs are async... How about sd-dns? It is slightly > wrong, but sd-ns could mean anything... libsystemd-dns sounds good to me. >> Right now I am more leaning towards the thread option. But maybe that >> changes tomorrow again. Other opinions? Kay? >> >> glib is embedding a copy of libasyncns currently, they opted for the >> thread solution. Maybe we should follow suit. > > Doesn't seem to be any strong arguments either way... So shall we just > go with pthreads, if that's what's used elsewhere...? Yeah, a thread to call into the nss stuff sound like the better option than a worker process. Kay _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel