On Fri, 24.01.14 16:09, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote: > Am 24.01.2014 16:03, schrieb Lennart Poettering: > > It is our job to shutdown all services cleanly. A number of services > > needs this, since they need to bring their files into a safe state > > before quitting, and mark them as "offline". We cannot just drop that. > > > > Note however, that we add have timeouts on all service shutdown > > commands, so when some service hangs it will be forcibly aborted with > > SIGKILL after 90s. > > > > That all said, you can just shutdown with "systemctl poweroff -f" > > instead of normal "systemctl poweroff". This will still bring the file > > systems in order and things, but wil not bother with shutting down > > system services cleanly, but simply SIGTERM and SIGKILL them after a > > much shorter timeout. > > > > However, something like that can never be the default, we need to give > > services the chance to shut down cleanly and in the right order > > then bugs like https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023820
I have so far never encountered this issue, but I fear this is a bug where somebody who can reproduce this needs to sit down and debug a bit... Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
