On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 6:53 PM, Lennart Poettering <lenn...@poettering.net> wrote: > On Fri, 24.01.14 18:45, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote: > >> >>>> However, something like that can never be the default, we need to give >> >>>> services the chance to shut down cleanly and in the right order. >> >>> >> >>> I didn't ask for any change to any default, I just asked for >> >>> users to be able to make the shutdown process proceed when >> >>> they have more information than systemd has about the chances >> >>> of success of some random stop job. >> >>> >> >>> Without that, what you *will* get is people pulling the >> >>> power plug which has a vastly greater chance of screwing up >> >>> the system than not waiting for a single stop job. >> >> >> >> Perhaps just displaying the timeout would be useful here. >> > >> > We do that. Michal's "eye of sauron" animation is shown as soon as >> > something blocks too long, and the name of the unit we are waiting for >> > is shown. >> >> but there is nothing saying how long the timeout remains >> "displaying the timeout" means a value in seconds > > That delay is set to 5s. > > (Oh, and where I wrote "eye of sauron" I meant "cylon". I guess this > reveals my utter ignorance of all things science fiction and fantasy. We > have this animation in there now since a while, and quite frankly, I > have no idea where this supposedly is inspired from, except it's > something with spaceships, which already turns me off so much I quickly > stop listening...)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oYZcZSVYx3M Kay _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel