Thanks Michael for answering, :) On 26 March 2014 18:59, Michael Biebl <mbi...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2014-03-26 3:56 GMT+01:00 Kai Hendry <hen...@webconverger.com>: > If your daemon is not functional if the hardware is not present, I'd > probably start it via a udev rule and SYSTEMD_WANTS.
Do you have an example for this please? I don't quite understand why I can't I just name the device in the service file. Why does it have to be so confusing. Still don't understand the need for escaping... is there a need? Thank you, _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
