On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Lennart Poettering <lenn...@poettering.net> wrote: > On Wed, 09.04.14 10:07, Mike Gilbert (flop...@gentoo.org) wrote: > >> Matches default behavior in recent util-linux. > > Quite frankly, this is really really broken in Gentoo. Randomly moving > packages from /sbin to /usr/sbin that are required during early boot is > just wrong. Either you keep the distinction between the two dirs, and > then fsck clearly belongs in /sbin, and not /usr/sbin, or you remove the > distinction, and then /sbin should be a symlink to /usr/sbin so that the > distinction doesn't matter. > > But this scheme that Gentoo is following there, is just a recipe for > breaking almost every possible package. > > The /usr merge is about increasing compatibility by providing everything > in both dirs. But Gentoo is really decreasing compatibility with itself > here by randomly moving things around and not providing things under the > old location. Really, you should rethink this, it's bogus! Entirely and > completely bogus! >
As I said before, I don't maintain the dosfsprogs package, so I personally have no control over this. I'm not a fan of randomly moving things around either. I will pass along your comments to our base-system team. > Anyway, even though I strongl disagree with how Gentoo is handling the > transition here, the patch looks OK and should probably go in. > Thank you for reviewing. I will make another pass on this over the weekend. _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel