On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 11:37:09AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 07-04-15 07:07, Peter Hutterer wrote: > >On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 04:11:59PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > >>Lenovo has changed the sensitity of the trackpoint on the x240 / T440s / > >>T540 > > > >s/sensitity/sensitivity/ > > > >>generation of Thinkpads, making them somewhat unsensitive by default, add a > > > >I think it's "insensitive", not unsensitive. > > > >>hwdb entry to tweak the sensitivity setting. > >> > >>The ThinkPad X200s is way way too slow by default and unless you push the > >>trackpoint quite hard only sends delta events in the 1-2 range, tweak the > >>sensitivity to make it send a wider range of deltas and apply a const accel > >>factor to make it have a more reasonable speed by default. > >>--- > >> hwdb/70-pointingstick.hwdb | 14 ++++++++++++++ > >> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+) > >> > >>diff --git a/hwdb/70-pointingstick.hwdb b/hwdb/70-pointingstick.hwdb > >>index d92434e..ea53019 100644 > >>--- a/hwdb/70-pointingstick.hwdb > >>+++ b/hwdb/70-pointingstick.hwdb > >>@@ -68,3 +68,17 @@ > >> > >> # > >> # Sort by by brand, model > >>+ > >>+######################################### > >>+# Lenovo > >>+######################################### > >>+ > >>+# Lenovo Thinkpad X200s > >>+pointingstick:name:TPPS/2 IBM > >>TrackPoint:dmi:bvn*:bvr*:bd*:svnLENOVO:pn*:pvrThinkPadX200s:* > >>+ POINTINGSTICK_SENSITIVITY=200 > >>+ POINTINGSTICK_CONST_ACCEL=1.5 > >>+ > >>+# Lenovo Thinkpad T440s > >>+pointingstick:name:TPPS/2 IBM > >>TrackPoint:dmi:bvn*:bvr*:bd*:svnLENOVO:pn*:pvrThinkPadT440s:* > > > >this only catches the T440s, shouldn't we add the 240 and 540 as well then? > > Yes and probably also the x1 from the same generation, etc. The problems are: > > 1) Do we want to enable this on all without even a smoke-test ? > 2) We need to have the DMI strings for these to add entries (I'm pretty sure > we've those in > some old bugs / patches) > > Tonight I should be able to loan an x240 for a few hours then I'll test to > see if it indeed too > is too insensitive by default (according to the interwebs it is) and add an > entry for it too.
I'd say if the t440 and the x240 are both affected, the t540 will be too so we can add this untested. Cheers, Peter _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
