On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Lennart Poettering <lenn...@poettering.net> wrote:
> On Wed, 04.11.15 15:54, Andrei Borzenkov (arvidj...@gmail.com) wrote: > > > 04.11.2015 00:04, Andrew Jones пишет: > > >afaict, this will fix a regression caused by commit 75f86906c5. > > >Where we used to report "kvm" before that patch, without this patch, > > >we would only report "qemu". > > > > Are you sure it is regression? QEMU is a program (platform) while KVM is > > technology. Modern VirtualBox can use KVM as PV interface but it still > > remains VirtualBox. QEMU may use KVM as PV interface but it still remains > > QEMU. > > > > Where does it matter? Is anything broken because of this change? > > I am pretty sure that vbox should be reported as vbox even if it uses > kvm as backend. qemu-kvm should be reported as kvm, and any other qemu > as qemu. > As I understand it, VirtualBox doesn't use KVM as *backend*; it only exposes a KVM-like paravirt interface to *guests*. -- Mantas Mikulėnas <graw...@gmail.com>
_______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
