Hello Jóhann, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson [2016-07-06 16:22 +0000]: > It's more about people will be have hard time distinguish between two or > more type units with the same name but serve two different purposes.
I was thinking graphical.target would be nicely symmetrical to the system-level one, but there's the confusion potential, yes. So if we call the "real" sessions like gnome-session.target, then IMHO that generic "alias" target should have the same form; graphical-session.target would be reasonable. > One way to solve them is with type target units as you proposed ( > user-graphical.target could serve that purpose ) but back in the day Lennart > was against introducing generic type targets like webserver.target, > database.target etc Oh, I wasn't aware of this. I guess we'll let him have the last word about that then? :-) I'll go ahead and create a PR with the unit and a manpage, using graphical-session.target for now. Then the name bikeshedding can be continued there. BTW, I updated http://people.canonical.com/~pitti/tmp/session.sh to have a kde.target as well, to demonstrate that this works with two independent sessions. Thanks everyone for their input! Martin -- Martin Pitt | http://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer (www.debian.org) _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel