On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 11:30:40PM +0300, Kevin Wilson wrote: > Hello, Daniel, > > > We don't want to support out of tree kernel patches, > > This sounds very reasonable, I don't have anything against this policy. > > Still, I wonder: are you ruling out implementing "hybrid mode" (like > Lennart uses in systemd) for libvirt? I mean a mode where you will use > the 3 currently supported cgroup V2 controllers for libvirt (memory, > io and pids; actually I don't know if you use the cgroups pids at all > in libvirt, it is a new controller; BTW - do you ? ). And using other > controllers (besides io, memory and pids) from cgroup V1
A controller can only be used in one mode at any time - so while libvirt could potentially support using some in v1 mode and some in v2 mode, it only works if the OS distro has actually setup those controllers in v1 mode - if they're in v2 mode, we'd be forced to use them in v2 mode. Regards, Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel