Hey Jani! On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 4:16 PM, Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@intel.com> wrote: > On Fri, 24 Feb 2017, Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@intel.com> wrote: >> While both the DMI and ACPI data are regarded as unreliable in hostnamed >> source, consumers of the chassis type use it to make rather drastic >> policy decisions. > > BTW, since the implementation seems to think the data is unreliable, > perhaps it would be prudent to say so in hostnamectl documentation, so > the consumers of the data might be more thoughtful about what to use it > for?
Turned into a github PR [1]. Can we continue the discussion there? Thanks David [1] https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/5475 _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel