On Di, 29.08.23 11:56, Cecil Westerhof (cldwester...@gmail.com) wrote: > > I agree with that usecase, and we have discussed this many times > > before, but we couldn#t come up with a nice way to make everything > > work: proper ordering and distintion of stdout/stderr. > > I agree that the default behaviour is the right one. But why not give > people the possibility to override this behaviour? When they override it > themselves, they cannot complain that they lose ordering.
We are generally conservative when providing mechanisms that are too glaringly broken. Even if they are opt-in. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Berlin
