Hi Mantas,

I ran your suggestion and here is the result:

root@host:/run/user# ls -la
drwxr-xr-x    2 root     root            40 Dec 13 11:24 .
drwxr-xr-x   99 root     root          2160 Dec 13 11:00 ..
root@host:/run/user# /usr/lib/systemd/systemd-user-runtime-dir start 1001
root@host:/run/user# ls -la
drwxr-xr-x    3 root     root            60 Dec 13 11:25 .
drwxr-xr-x   99 root     root          2160 Dec 13 11:00 ..
drwx------    2 ida      ssh-user        40 Dec 13 11:25 1001
root@host:/run/user# mount | grep /run
tmpfs on /run type tmpfs (rw,nosuid,nodev,mode=755)
tmpfs on /run/user/1001 type tmpfs 
(rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime,size=97096k,nr_inodes=24274,mode=700,uid=1001,gid=118)

This seems to be correct, and I could see /run/user/1001 listed using “mount”.

Thank you for your explaination! We have probably be running with a uncomplete 
setup of the mount before.

Best regards,
Christopher Wong


From: Mantas Mikulėnas <graw...@gmail.com>
Date: Wednesday, 13 December 2023 at 10:33
To: Christopher Wong <christopher.w...@axis.com>
Cc: Systemd <systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] Manual start of user@<uid>.service failed with 
permission denied
On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 10:36 AM Christopher Wong 
<christopher.w...@axis.com<mailto:christopher.w...@axis.com>> wrote:
Hi Mantas,

I tried with StopWhenUnneeded=no in 
user-runtime-dir@.service<mailto:user-runtime-dir@.service>, then when 
user@1001.service<mailto:user@1001.service> fails the status of 
user-runtime-dir@.service<mailto:user-runtime-dir@.service> is active. At this 
state the directory /run/user/1001 is created, it is empty, owned by root. 
Running the mount command doesn’t show /run/user/1001.

Run the "/usr/lib/systemd/systemd-user-runtime-dir start 1001" manually and 
check whether the mounted filesystem is there afterwards.

If it's still not there, then run "mount -t tmpfs -o uid=1001,mode=0700 none 
/run/user/1001" and then check whether it stays mounted.



I have mentioned it before, but I want to point out that if I put 
“ExecStartPre=+chown %i /run/user/%i” in user@.service<mailto:user@.service> 
then the user@1001.service<mailto:user@1001.service> can be started manually. 
The mount command doesn’t show /run/user/1001 either, but since the service is 
started the path contains bus socket and systemd directory with content, which 
are the things I am after.

The main issue here is that /run/user/1001 is owned by root after 
user-runtime-dir@.service<mailto:user-runtime-dir@.service> has been exited 
successfully.

No, that's only a symptom of the main issue.

The current design that systemd implements is to have a user-specific tmpfs 
mounted at that location (for quota purposes), and so the underlying mountpoint 
is deliberately created as owned by root – its ownership is not changed because 
it's supposed to have a new filesystem mounted on top (which would make the 
mountpoint hidden and its ownership moot).

If you specifically want to *not* have an additional tmpfs there, then you can 
continue using the manual "ExecStartPre=chown" (or in fact you could replace 
the entire user-runtime-dir@ with a simpler one that only mkdirs and chowns), 
but in that case you shouldn't be saying that it's a systemd issue that it 
doesn't chown something that it was never meant to chown to begin with.


Best regards,
Christopher Wong


From: Mantas Mikulėnas <graw...@gmail.com<mailto:graw...@gmail.com>>
Date: Wednesday, 13 December 2023 at 08:08
To: Christopher Wong 
<christopher.w...@axis.com<mailto:christopher.w...@axis.com>>
Cc: Systemd 
<systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org<mailto:systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>>
Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] Manual start of user@<uid>.service failed with 
permission denied
On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 6:15 PM Christopher Wong 
<christopher.w...@axis.com<mailto:christopher.w...@axis.com>> wrote:
Hi Mantas,

After user@1001.service<mailto:user@1001.service> failed, it trigger the 
stopping process and become inactive.

Ah yeah, that makes sense, user-runtime-dir@ has StopWhenUnneeded=yes – so of 
course after user@1001 crashes you're not going to see anything mounted anymore.

Could you try temporarily removing that option / setting it to 'no', just to 
see what changes?



○ user-runtime-dir@1001.service<mailto:user-runtime-dir@1001.service> - User 
Runtime Directory /run/user/1001

     Loaded: loaded 
(/etc/systemd/system/user-runtime-dir@.service<mailto:/etc/systemd/system/user-runtime-dir@.service>;
 static)

    Drop-In: /usr/lib/systemd/system/service.d

             └─10-axis.conf, 20-axis-sandbox.conf

     Active: inactive (dead) since Tue 2023-12-12 16:33:35 CET; 36min ago

   Duration: 315ms

       Docs: man:user@.service(5)

    Process: 16325 ExecStartPre=ls -la /run/user (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS)

    Process: 16327 ExecStartPre=mount (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS)

    Process: 16329 ExecStart=/usr/lib/systemd/systemd-user-runtime-dir start 
1001 (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS)

    Process: 16334 ExecStartPost=sleep 5 (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS)

    Process: 16347 ExecStartPost=ls -la /run/user/1001 (code=exited, 
status=0/SUCCESS)

    Process: 16351 ExecStartPost=mount (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS)

    Process: 16361 ExecStop=/usr/lib/systemd/systemd-user-runtime-dir stop 1001 
(code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS)

   Main PID: 16329 (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS)

        CPU: 48ms

/etc/fstab don’t include anything on /run/user/1001 and there is no mount unit 
for run-user-1001.mount either.

Best regards,
Christopher Wong


From: Mantas Mikulėnas <graw...@gmail.com<mailto:graw...@gmail.com>>
Date: Tuesday, 12 December 2023 at 17:05
To: Christopher Wong 
<christopher.w...@axis.com<mailto:christopher.w...@axis.com>>
Cc: Systemd 
<systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org<mailto:systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>>
Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] Manual start of user@<uid>.service failed with 
permission denied
That sounds like it's getting immediately unmounted (or maybe not being mounted 
at all despite the program doing so).

Does the user-runtime-dir service continue to show as "active" after this, or 
does it return to "inactive"?

Does your /etc/fstab have any mentions of /run/user/1001? Or more generally, 
are there any run-user-1001.mount units? (If you 'systemctl status' this unit, 
does the status include a source path?)

On Tue, Dec 12, 2023, 17:34 Christopher Wong 
<christopher.w...@axis.com<mailto:christopher.w...@axis.com>> wrote:
Hi Mantas,

I currently have the following flow:


  1.  No /run/user/1001 directory
  2.  systemctl start user@1001.service<mailto:user@1001.service>
  3.  systemd start 
user-runtime-dir@1001.service<mailto:user-runtime-dir@1001.service> which ends 
successfully.
  4.  The directory /run/user/1001 exists now, but is empty, owned by root with 
mode 0700
  5.  I don’t have findmnt on my system, so I used mount, but /run/user/1001 is 
not listed.
  6.  systemd start user@1001.service<mailto:user@1001.service> which fails due 
to permission denied.

I can’t explain why the /run/user/1001 is owned by root after 
user-runtime-dir@1001.service<mailto:user-runtime-dir@1001.service> 
successfully exited. I added some personal print in systemd code to ensure that 
the mount command returned success (r=0). Although, the mount was successful 
the command “mount” didn’t list it. In the list of mounts starting with /run I 
could only find these entries:


Dec 12 16:19:35 host mount[14500]: tmpfs on /run type tmpfs 
(rw,nosuid,nodev,mode=755)

Dec 12 16:19:35 host mount[14500]: tmpfs on /run/credentials type tmpfs 
(ro,nosuid,nodev,noexec,mode=755)

Dec 12 16:19:35 host mount[14500]: tmpfs on /run/systemd/incoming type tmpfs 
(ro,nosuid,nodev,mode=755)

If I do a chown of the directory in user@1001.service<mailto:user@1001.service> 
then it works

root@host:/run/user# ls -la 1001
drwx------    3 ida      root            80 Dec 12 16:19 .
drwxr-xr-x    3 root     root            60 Dec 12 16:19 ..
srw-rw-rw-    1 ida      ssh-user         0 Dec 12 16:19 bus
drwxr-xr-x    5 ida      ssh-user       140 Dec 12 16:19 systemd

The ”mount” command don’t list /run/user/1001 for the successful case either.

Best regards,
Christopher Wong


From: Mantas Mikulėnas <graw...@gmail.com<mailto:graw...@gmail.com>>
Date: Monday, 11 December 2023 at 17:56
To: Christopher Wong 
<christopher.w...@axis.com<mailto:christopher.w...@axis.com>>
Cc: Systemd 
<systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org<mailto:systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>>
Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] Manual start of user@<uid>.service failed with 
permission denied
On Mon, Dec 11, 2023, 17:28 Christopher Wong 
<christopher.w...@axis.com<mailto:christopher.w...@axis.com>> wrote:
Hi Mantas,

I have added ExecStartPre to user@.service<mailto:user@.service> to run “id” 
and “ls -la”:

Dec 11 15:50:34 host systemd-user-runtime-dir[40287]: Will mount /run/user/1001 
owned by 1001:118
Dec 11 15:50:34 host systemd-user-runtime-dir[40287]: Mounting tmpfs (tmpfs) on 
/run/user/1001 (MS_NOSUID|MS_NODEV 
"mode=0700,uid=1001,gid=118,size=99426304,nr_inodes=24274")...
Dec 11 15:50:34 host systemd[1]: Finished User Runtime Directory /run/user/1001.
Dec 11 15:50:34 host systemd[1]: Starting User Manager for UID 1001...
Dec 11 15:50:34 host id[40291]: uid=1001(ida) gid=118(ssh-users) 
groups=118(ssh-users),236(systemd-journal)
Dec 11 15:50:34 host ls[40293]: drwxr-xr-x    3 root     root            60 Dec 
11 15:50 .
Dec 11 15:50:34 host ls[40293]: drwxr-xr-x   98 root     root          2120 Dec 
11 15:30 ..
Dec 11 15:50:34 host ls[40293]: drwx------    2 root     root            40 Dec 
11 15:50 1001
Dec 11 15:50:34 host systemd[40294]: systemd 254.7-2-g9edc143 running in user 
mode for user 1001/ida. (-PAM -AUDIT -SELINUX -APPARMOR +IMA -SMACK +SECCOMP 
+GCRYPT +GNUTLS +OPENSSL -ACL +BLKID +CURL -ELFUTILS -FIDO2 -IDN2 -IDN -IPTC 
+KMOD -LIBCRYPTSETUP +LIBFDISK -PCRE2 -PWQUALITY -P11KIT -QRENCODE -TPM2 +BZIP2 
-LZ4 +XZ +ZLIB +ZSTD -BPF_FRAMEWORK -XKBCOMMON -UTMP -SYSVINIT 
default-hierarchy=unified)

The /run/user/1001 belongs to root with mode 0700. Should this belong to root?
No, it should be owned by UID 1001 (though still mode 0700).
Is it because I manually start user@1001.service<mailto:user@1001.service> as 
root?
Which user started the .service is usually not important, all services get a 
"fresh" environment that's fully described by the unit file.

So even if you did 'systemctl start' as root, the unit has User=%i so the 
instance parameter tells it which UID to run as, so will be running as UID 
1001. Likewise user-runtime-dir@1001 will get the UID for the mount from its 
instance name (you can see that the "Mounting tmpfs" message has the correct 
information).
However, after 
user-runtime-dir@1001.service<mailto:user-runtime-dir@1001.service> has 
finished it startup,  the user@1001.service<mailto:user@1001.service> is 
started as uid=1001 and therefore can’t create any directories under 
/run/user/1001. Resulting in user@1001.service<mailto:user@1001.service> failed 
to start.

If I add “ExecStartPre=+chown %i /run/user/%i” to 
user@.service<mailto:user@.service> then it works! But I am unsure if this is 
really the way fix this.

So far, it sounds like the directory is being created *by something else* 
before user-runtime-dir@ is even invoked.

Try adding the same "-/bin/ls -lad /run/user/%i" as both ExecStartPre and 
ExecStartPost of user-runtime-dir@ (and maybe even a findmnt). If the directory 
already exists during ExecStartPre, start looking for other services or 
cronjobs, or tmpfiles.d configs, or 'su' invocations, which may cause it to be 
created.

There might also be something that chowns it to root *after* it was created 
correctly. If you actually see the tmpfs mount in 'findmnt' or in 'mount', but 
it's owned by root despite having uid=1001 in its mount options, something has 
chowned it...or your tmpfs feature is broken.

If you don't see it in findmnt at all, even after user-runtime-dir has 
succeeded – either the mount failed quietly, or... something (like systemd 
itself) has quietly unmounted it.


Regarding the testing, I have done both restart of everything and manual, but 
the result is the same. Now that I have the 
“Environment=XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=/run/user/%i” I no longer need to do “systemctl 
set-environment …”

Thank you for taking your time!

Best regards,
Christopher Wong


From: Mantas Mikulėnas <graw...@gmail.com<mailto:graw...@gmail.com>>
Date: Friday, 8 December 2023 at 21:53
To: Christopher Wong 
<christopher.w...@axis.com<mailto:christopher.w...@axis.com>>
Cc: Systemd 
<systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org<mailto:systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>>
Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] Manual start of user@<uid>.service failed with 
permission denied
On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 6:53 PM Christopher Wong 
<christopher.w...@axis.com<mailto:christopher.w...@axis.com>> wrote:
Hi Mantas,

I have from your suggestion done the following:

Putting the below in user@.service

[Service]
...
Environment=XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=/run/user/%i
Environment=SYSTEMD_LOG_LEVEL=debug

Putting the below in user-runtime-dir@.service

[Service]
...
Environment=SYSTEMD_LOG_LEVEL=debug

Then I have disabled the global set-log-level debug (if this is also required, 
please let me know).

Unlike set-environment that's not global, it only affects pid1.


What I can see from the logs is that 
user-runtime-dir@1001.service<mailto:user-runtime-dir@1001.service> seems to be 
started and mount /run/user/1001, but addition creation of directory under this 
mount is getting permission denied.

Dec 08 17:33:29 host systemd[1]: Created slice User Slice of UID 1001.
Dec 08 17:33:29 host systemd[1]: Starting User Runtime Directory 
/run/user/1001...
Dec 08 17:33:29 host systemd-user-runtime-dir[36278]: Bus n/a: changing state 
UNSET -> OPENING
Dec 08 17:33:29 host systemd-user-runtime-dir[36278]: sd-bus: starting bus by 
connecting to /run/dbus/system_bus_socket...
Dec 08 17:33:29 host systemd-user-runtime-dir[36278]: Bus n/a: changing state 
OPENING -> AUTHENTICATING
Dec 08 17:33:29 host systemd-user-runtime-dir[36278]: Bus n/a: changing state 
AUTHENTICATING -> HELLO
Dec 08 17:33:29 host systemd-user-runtime-dir[36278]: Sent message 
type=method_call sender=n/a destination=org.freedesktop.DBus 
path=/org/freedesktop/DBus interface=org.freedesktop.DBus member=Hello cookie=1 
reply_cookie=0 signature=n/a error-name=n/a error-message=n/a
Dec 08 17:33:29 host systemd-user-runtime-dir[36278]: Got message 
type=method_return sender=org.freedesktop.DBus destination=:1.2536 path=n/a 
interface=n/a member=n/a  cookie=1 reply_cookie=1 signature=s error-name=n/a 
error-message=n/a
Dec 08 17:33:29 host systemd-user-runtime-dir[36278]: Bus n/a: changing state 
HELLO -> RUNNING
Dec 08 17:33:29 host systemd-user-runtime-dir[36278]: Sent message 
type=method_call sender=n/a destination=org.freedesktop.login1 
path=/org/freedesktop/login1 interface=org.freedesktop.DBus.Properties 
member=Get cookie=2 reply_cookie=0 signature=ss error-name=n/a error-message=n/a
Dec 08 17:33:29 host systemd-user-runtime-dir[36278]: Got message 
type=method_return sender=:1.323 destination=:1.2536 path=n/a interface=n/a 
member=n/a  cookie=15 reply_cookie=2 signature=v error-name=n/a 
error-message=n/a
Dec 08 17:33:29 host systemd-user-runtime-dir[36278]: Sent message 
type=method_call sender=n/a destination=org.freedesktop.login1 
path=/org/freedesktop/login1 interface=org.freedesktop.DBus.Properties 
member=Get cookie=3 reply_cookie=0 signature=ss error-name=n/a error-message=n/a
Dec 08 17:33:29 host systemd-user-runtime-dir[36278]: Got message 
type=method_return sender=:1.323 destination=:1.2536 path=n/a interface=n/a 
member=n/a  cookie=16 reply_cookie=3 signature=v error-name=n/a 
error-message=n/a
Dec 08 17:33:29 host systemd-user-runtime-dir[36278]: Bus n/a: changing state 
RUNNING -> CLOSED
Dec 08 17:33:29 host systemd-user-runtime-dir[36278]: Will mount /run/user/1001 
owned by 1001:118
Dec 08 17:33:29 host systemd-user-runtime-dir[36278]: Mounting tmpfs (tmpfs) on 
/run/user/1001 (MS_NOSUID|MS_NODEV 
"mode=0700,uid=1001,gid=118,size=99426304,nr_inodes=24274")...
Dec 08 17:33:29 host systemd[1]: Finished User Runtime Directory /run/user/1001.
Dec 08 17:33:29 host systemd[1]: Starting User Manager for UID 1001...
Dec 08 17:33:29 host systemd[36280]: systemd 254.7-2-g9edc143 running in user 
mode for user 1001/ida. (-PAM -AUDIT -SELINUX -APPARMOR +IMA -SMACK +SECCOMP 
+GCRYPT +GNUTLS +OPENSSL -ACL +BLKID +CURL -ELFUTILS -FIDO2 -IDN2 -IDN -IPTC 
+KMOD -LIBCRYPTSETUP +LIBFDISK -PCRE2 -PWQUALITY -P11KIT -QRENCODE -TPM2 +BZIP2 
-LZ4 +XZ +ZLIB +ZSTD -BPF_FRAMEWORK -XKBCOMMON -UTMP -SYSVINIT 
default-hierarchy=unified)
Dec 08 17:33:29 host systemd[36280]: Failed to create 
'/run/user/1001/systemd/inaccessible', ignoring: Permission denied
Dec 08 17:33:29 host systemd[36280]: Failed to create 
'/run/user/1001/systemd/inaccessible/reg', ignoring: Permission denied
Dec 08 17:33:29 host systemd[36280]: Failed to create 
'/run/user/1001/systemd/inaccessible/dir', ignoring: Permission denied
Dec 08 17:33:29 host systemd[36280]: Failed to create 
'/run/user/1001/systemd/inaccessible/fifo', ignoring: Permission denied
Dec 08 17:33:29 host systemd[36280]: Failed to create 
'/run/user/1001/systemd/inaccessible/sock', ignoring: Permission denied
Dec 08 17:33:29 host systemd[36280]: Failed to create 
'/run/user/1001/systemd/inaccessible/chr', ignoring: Permission denied
Dec 08 17:33:29 host systemd[36280]: Failed to create 
'/run/user/1001/systemd/inaccessible/blk', ignoring: Permission denied

What's the ownership of /run/user/1001 and /run/user/1001/systemd after all of 
this?

Are you rebooting between tests or just manually starting it?

My current guess is that due to the earlier `systemctl set-environment`, some 
*other* thing that's running as root inherited the /run/user/1001 path and 
created root-owned directories there? That's the issue with setting global 
environment, it needs to be unset afterwards...

--
Mantas Mikulėnas


--
Mantas Mikulėnas


--
Mantas Mikulėnas

Reply via email to