tight/spacious/critical are terms from the Dutch guidance on assessing/adapting roads for cycling, and endorsed by UK guidance (Type "LTN208" into your favourite search engine if interested)
Richard On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 3:18 AM, Steve Bennett <stevag...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 9:59 AM, Richard Mann < > richard.mann.westoxf...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >> While we're about it, there's a few other potential values for cycleway >> (for interest mainly): >> >> cycleway=buslane (shared with buses) >> > > Has potential. > > >> cycleway=filterlane (explicitly shared with nearside-turning traffic) >> > > Has potential. > > >> cycleway=tight (nearside lane is shared with traffic and is <3.1m wide >> > > Two descriptive. Sounds awfully much like "cycleway=no" to me. > > >> cycleway=spacious (nearside lane is shared with traffic and is >3.7m wide, >> more if typical traffic speed is faster than 40kph) >> > > There's something here. If you look at: > > http://www.nearmap.com/?ll=-37.859974,145.16891&z=21&t=k > > This is Springvale Rd, in Melbourne's eastern suburbs. I'm told that that > left lane (on the northbound side) is deliberately wider to cater for > cyclists. It's not really a bike lane, but there is some benefit for > cyclists there. > > > >> cycleway=critical (nearside lane is shared with traffic and between tight >> and spacious) >> > > Nah. > > Steve > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
