as the one who drafted "Extended conditions" I would like to make some comments. The proposal should not compete with "Access restriction 1.5" (or similar proposals). My proposal aims to consolidate and unify existing tags instead of proposing a complete new way of tagging -see the one example at the beginning of the proposal. "Extended conditions" will not change any of the existing access restriction tags and also not change the existing ":" separator for compatibility reasons. This can not be done without some "dirty" workarounds like defining [access] and [all] as default values but it would be compatible with existing and generally accepted tagging. "Access restriction 1.5" would change many of widely used tags and as such require a much more complex, long discussion and evaluation. So I suggest to differ between
i) making some smaller changes to the existing tagging very soon to enable people to tag some common cases like maxweight=12 maxweight:destination=none or maxspeed:hgv:wet=80 ii) discussing the future of access restrictions which will also replace i) once agreed. -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Reviving-the-conditions-debate-tp5712480p5712901.html Sent from the Tagging mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
