Sean <4ey0ll...@sneakemail.com> wrote: > program or device will still display the way as a roundabout that the > user will still understand what it is even if the roundabout tag is removed.
The user may understand, but the device won't if there are no tags. However I see below that I've been misunderstanding what you've been saying, and you're not saying to get rid of the tags. > As you said "It's relatively easy" to do then, > could you please supply the code or tell them how to do it. I'm sure it > would be greatly appreciated. When I say "relatively easy" I mean relative to the significant effort required to build the entire conversion process. I don't mean "trivial". > I'm not advocating the removal of any tags. I'm advocating that all > roundabouts no matter on size be drawn as a way and be tagged as > "juction=roundabout". Okay, this makes a lot of sense. Sorry but I missed this part of your argument before. Tagging the roundabout in some way is very important to preserve meaning, not just appearance. -- Sam Couter | mailto:s...@couter.id.au OpenPGP fingerprint: A46B 9BB5 3148 7BEA 1F05 5BD5 8530 03AE DE89 C75C _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
