On 20 June 2011 03:12, Grant Slater <openstreet...@firefishy.com> wrote: > I am sure theortical (and legally risky) loopholes could be found for > example as you describe above. We could have contructed painfully
A simple admission that the previous email is a valid argument would have sufficed > We have people subverting our CC-BY-SA license right now!!1! *zomg* > And they wouldn't be abusing our ODbL license in future. > Case: UN: http://www.unitar.org/unosat-releases-new-maps-over-haiti Nice spin on things, except they need to adhere to copyright like everyone else, however what I've pointed out is completely legit and has no recourse. _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
