Hi Kim, If you have added the website tag I must have missed it, too many tabs. I did not mean to come across condescending. I'm sorry. -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
On 26 July 2019 9:51:19 am AEST, Kim Oldfield <o...@oldfield.wattle.id.au> wrote: >Hi Sebastian, > >The source website was in the tag I added: >website=http://www.maroondahleisure.com.au/venues/maroondah-nets/ > >My understanding of how to use source is as a generic description of >where the information came from, rather than an exact reference. For >example https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:source lists >source="aerial imagery" as commonly used, while I would have expected >it >to be depreciated with preference to the name of the aerial imagery >used, eg source=bing. > > >On 26/7/19 9:02 am, Sebastian Spiess wrote: >> Hi, I find it odd that you state source:website but don't proved the >> website in the website tag. Why not? >> >> PS: I see the website of the business as the virtual front and >> consider the information public as any sign etc on the actual shop. >So >> Yes I do this also all the time. (Individual POIs, not mass import) >> >> Am 2019-07-22 15:47, schrieb Kim Oldfield: >>> Graeme: It's nice to know that I'm not the only one who has done >this. >>> This particular change caused me to reconsider how appropriate it is >>> as it was all sourced from the website so I used source=website >which, >>> when viewed superficially, appears to contradict guidelines for >where >>> to source map data. >>> >>> Andrew: It is nice to know that this is generally considered OK for >>> individual facts. >>> >>> Adrian: As part of manually adding these facts I check that the >>> address I'm adding is for this physical location, ie at least the >>> street adjoins the business being tagged. >>> >>> On 22/7/19 3:28 pm, Adrian Hobbs wrote: >>>> Might be issues where contact address (e.g. head office) being >>>> copied is different to physical location on map. >>>> Adrian Hobbs >>>> >>>> Sent from BlueMail >>>> >>>> On 22 Jul. 2019, 15:21, at 15:21, Andrew Harvey >>>> <andrew.harv...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> This has come up a few times on the mailing lists, and the advise >>>>> usually >>>>> given is it's okay to source a few facts here and there like the >>>>> address or >>>>> contact number, but just don't start taking a whole database of >venues >>>>> and >>>>> copy that database. >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, 22 Jul 2019 at 13:06, Kim Oldfield ><o...@oldfield.wattle.id.au> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Is it acceptable to copy a street address (and other contact >details) >>>>>> from a business's webpage? >>>>>> >>>>>> For example in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/72452124 >(what >>>>>> changed is easier to see at >>>>>> https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/705884944 ) I >added >>>>> the >>>>>> street address as listed on their website. >>>>>> >>>>>> If this isn't acceptable, what is an acceptable way of getting an >>>>>> address if it is not obvious during a site survey? >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> Kim >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Talk-au mailing list >>>>>> Talk-au@openstreetmap.org >>>>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Talk-au mailing list >>>>> Talk-au@openstreetmap.org >>>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Talk-au mailing list >>> Talk-au@openstreetmap.org >>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
