Many vineyards have numbered rows with a tag on the end strainer posts to assist direction of workers, etc. These could be numbered using the addr interpolation scheme and then individual rows would not need to be mapped but does need a close survey.
> On 15 Oct 2020, at 3:32 pm, Graeme Fitzpatrick <graemefi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > >> On Thu, 15 Oct 2020 at 14:13, John Bryant <johnwbry...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Looking more broadly, it looks like vine rows haven't been widely mapped >> before. > > Do you need to? > > I think it could be automatically assumed that all vineyards have their vines > in rows, approx the same distance apart? > > I noticed vine_row_orientation=* : vine row orientation (in degrees)on the > wiki page - wouldn't that be sufficient? > >> For vine *rows* (ie. the linear features within the vineyard), we've had >> suggestions of natural=tree_row, > > If you were going to put a tree_row on every row of vines, you'd have nothing > but a solid mass of them! > >> denotation=agricultural, > > Sorry, not sure what you mean with this? > >> and crop=grape, > > Marked as being redundant as all vineyards grow grapes! :-) > > Thanks > > Graeme > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-au mailing list > Talk-au@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
