Simon,
Without knowing the nature of the challenge, I assume the apparent
anomaly is a road apparently bulldozing through a building.
Me, I'd either leave it as it is or to be squeaky clean (if I know from
on-the-ground) I'd map the two sticky out bits as building=roof. I don't
know if there is any consensus on whether a simple canvas awning counts
as a "roof" or a temporary accoutrement not worthy of mapping at all -
others may comment.
This could also be an opportunity to introduce simple 3d buildings. Here
leave the building as is but within it draw 3 building part areas:
building:part=roof, building:part=roof, building:part=yes
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:part
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_3D_Buildings
Here is what Swan Hill currently looks like:
https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=-35.3427895&lon=143.5619395&zoom=18
Mike
On 2021-08-11 08:23, Simon Slater wrote:
G'day all,
From a Maproulette challenge ( https://maproulette.org/browse/
challenges/19168 ) which had a couple of things in our area marked as VIC -
BuildingRoadIntersectionCheck , one of which is a KFC drive-through with
awnings, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/-35.34316/143.56033
Is this something to leave as-is, or should a change be made to either the way
or building or both? If a change is needed, what type?
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au