No we need to persuade the municipalities to move to the new standard license in the TB kit and I think Stats will have better success that we will in the first instance also Open-Ouvert could probably let us know which municipalities have expressed an interest in the new license.
Cheerio John On 27 September 2017 at 18:52, Alan Richards <alarob...@gmail.com> wrote: > It's still a different license for each city, province, or organisation, > and the current opinion is that each different license needs to go through > the same multi-month review to be approved for OSM. > > On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 3:48 PM, john whelan <jwhelan0...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> T.B. have what they call a Municipal Open Data kit which basically has >> the same license as the city of Ottawa uses plus how to use it. >> >> Cheerio John >> >> On 27 September 2017 at 18:40, Stewart Russell <scr...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> But they can't use OGL-CA v2 cos municipalities aren't federal. And >>> anything but the actual few already approved licences need a multi-month >>> review. >>> >>> Stewart >>> >>> On Sep 27, 2017 18:28, "James" <james2...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> other then have them change their license from say ogl-ca v1 to ogl-cav2 >>>> >>>> theres not much we can do from a legal stand point. ogl-ca v1 puts too >>>> many restrictions >>>> >>>> On Sep 27, 2017 6:21 PM, "Matthew Darwin" <matt...@mdarwin.ca> wrote: >>>> >>>>> How do we want to move this discussion forward? Do we need to set up >>>>> a time to talk on the phone? I am willing to help coordinate logistics. >>>>> >>>>> On 2017-09-17 10:55 AM, Stewart C. Russell wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 2017-09-17 10:40 AM, john whelan wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> They'd like to extend it across Canada so now might be the time to >>>>>>> think >>>>>>> about the project. >>>>>>> >>>>>> That sounds good. Despite some prodding, the Licence Working Group >>>>>> (LWG) >>>>>> hasn't got back to me with any updates on how they want to handle the >>>>>> Toronto or Ontario licences. I first contacted them in March, so if it >>>>>> takes them six months or more to look at the licence, then this import >>>>>> is a multi year (if not multi-decade) project. Remember, LWG has >>>>>> decided >>>>>> that *every* Canadian licence variant needs their sign-off. >>>>>> >>>>>> Denis Carr (open data lead) from Toronto has been on board since the >>>>>> spring, and I hope hasn't forgotten us. >>>>>> >>>>>> Toronto has nice building outlines (embedded in the 3D Massing data >>>>>> set, >>>>>> so we can pull out base elevation and height). We also have address >>>>>> points already in the middle of buildings. >>>>>> >>>>>> It also is of great help that the Esri Community Imagery includes some >>>>>> very nice municipal air photos for verification. >>>>>> >>>>>> Stewart >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Talk-ca mailing list >>>>>> Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org >>>>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Talk-ca mailing list >>>>> Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org >>>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca >>>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Talk-ca mailing list >>>> Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org >>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca >>>> >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Talk-ca mailing list >>> Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org >>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-ca mailing list >> Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca >> >> >
_______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca