On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Richard Fairhurst <rich...@systemed.net> wrote: > Frankie Roberto wrote: >> Have copied chippy and RichardF in, in the hope that they can help us >> connect things up. > > Potlatch doesn't do WMS, it only does 900913 tiles (like OSM itself). > You specify them in this format: > > http://tiles.mytileserver.org/directory/!/!/!.png > > where !, !, ! are z, x and y respectively. So, for example, you can have > OSM Mapnik tiles by typing > > http://a.tile.openstreetmap.org/!/!/!.png > > None of the links on that warper.geothings.net page are in that format,
1) Grab the geotiffs 2) gdalwarp 3) mapnik generate_tiles.py 4) stick them somewhere public 5) http://www.flickr.com/photos/gravitystorm/3930896331/ Now it would be awesome if mapwarper could warp straight to 900913, since that would save another warping. And I'm only using mapnik since it's the hammer I have to hand for combining multiple rasters and spitting out tiles. YMMV. Anyway, on the wider topic I believe individual warping is the best approach, and it would be nice to rank images on their "verticalness" so that I can stack them up with the most vertical ones visible on top and the most oblique ones where there isn't any better alternative. Cheers, Andy _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
