Matt Williams wrote: > 2009/9/18 Matt Williams <li...@milliams.com>: > >> 2009/9/18 John McKerrell <j...@mckerrell.net>: >> >>> On 18 Sep 2009, at 19:44, John McKerrell wrote: >>> >>>> On 18 Sep 2009, at 19:27, Matt Williams wrote: >>>> >>>>> A random selection of vertical(ish) photos: >>>>> 113-124 (all of one single area) >>>>> 127 >>>>> 149 >>>>> 628,632,633,636,637,638 (all of the centre near the bridges) >>>>> >>>>> I agree a systematic approach to tagging all the photos would be >>>>> better (anyone want to code up a tagging script?) but in the mean >>>>> time these would be good ones to rectify. >>>>> >>>> I'm actually almost ready to open up OpenStreetView and the code could >>>> be quite useful for this, you can upload geotagged images, show them >>>> on a map, get KML output. There's a moderation process that wouldn't >>>> be needed, but you could tweak it. I won't get time to release it >>>> until tomorrow though. >>>> >>> Just to confirm, I don't mean that you would upload these photos to >>> OSV, but the code will be open source so someone could easily set >>> something up (me, in theory, tho I'll be busy getting OSV going). >>> >> I'm currently hacking together a quick and dirty script to allow >> people to rate each image on its 'verticalness' should be up sometime >> tonight (haven't written PHP in quite a while!) >> > > Ok guys. I've got a first version up at > http://milliams.com/verticalitymetre/. At the moment it randomly > selects an image from the http://78.46.66.234/jpeg1600 directory, > creates a local cached thumbnail and prints it on a page (with the > thumbnail linking back to the original). I've chosen a selection of 5 > points on the 'verticality' scale with text descriptions. At the > moment, it saves your responses into a text file for each image. The > images chosen are still random so you may be tagging images that other > people have already done. This way I can just take a consensus at the > end. > > It will be quite slow the first time a person views any particular as > I have to fetch the image from the server but this will only be done > once for each image. John, if you'd rather I'd do this a different way > just tell me. Especially if it's hitting your server too hard (though > the sum total of download bandwidth from you should be less than 900 > MB -- ~878 images at ~1MB each). > > If at any point someone wants the statistics, just ask me. > > There's a small chance it will just suddenly go offline due to > bandwidth restrictions at my end but really it shouldn't. > > If anyone has any questions or suggestions I'm all ears. > > Get tagging. > Does it need a checkbox for sheep?
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
