On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 11:32 +0000, Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) wrote: > >On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 10:30 +0000, Peter Miller wrote: > >> On reflection possibly we should use river-bank as that has more > >> information in it, but recommend that anyone importing does a > 'bridge > >> cleanup' at the same time. > > > >This is an area I'm actually really interested in (for rural rivers) > and > keen to > >contribute. So far I've been put off by exactly this problem. Is a > reasonable > >approach to use the OS data for river edges and then fill in the gaps > (bridges > >etc) with OSM data? > > +1 > > If the OS vector data is only assumed to be the banks and the > additional > data for flow direction, bridges and other features are added from > survey/BING etc then we should end up with a very functional dataset.
Further to this point, what happens when there is a river with a tarn inline? For example: http://osm.org/go/evO4TBvG Should there be a continuous flow direction through the tarn? cheers, Henry _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
