Here are the corrected links, which David sent to just me! Simon
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: David Earl <da...@frankieandshadow.com> Date: 19 March 2013 20:45 Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Ambiguous restrictions sign To: Simon Blake <blake.ingenu...@gmail.com> On 19/03/2013 20:43, David Earl wrote: > On 19/03/2013 20:34, David Earl wrote: > >> On 19/03/2013 20:10, Simon Blake wrote: >> >>> Could I ask the panel about http://goo.gl/maps/y9Zj3 ? If you look >>> towards the road to the right (Parliament St, Gloucester), there are No >>> Entry signs with no exceptions signed, but on the road it says "Buses >>> and taxis only". Equally, the sign under the green filter arrow on the >>> right-hand traffic lights says "Except buses" - surely that should say >>> "Buses only". >>> >> >> This is just incompetent. Yes, the No Entry sign on the left should have >> an exception (interestingly the road is only wide enough for one bus and >> if you go further down the street we find it is traffic light >> controlled, so the right filter light must be linked to the one a >> hundred metres away - clever). Except that No Entry is unenforceable >> because they must always come in pairs and the one on the island belongs >> with the other one on the exit. I think the road marking is OK, but the >> one on the lights is definitely wrong - it should have a mini No Right >> Turn sign with that exception plate, built into the lights, like this >> (which is no left turn except cycles, but same principle >> http://bit.ly/ZbOhtZ ), along with the filter light. >> > > Here's a more comparable example, done properly: http://bit.ly/ZbOhtZ . > Doh, sorry, bitly didn't do what I expected. The second link should be http://goo.gl/maps/aMbhE (and the first http://goo.gl/maps/0ZjSD )
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
