On Tuesday, 10 January 2017 21:46:53 GMT Steve Doerr wrote: > On 10/01/2017 07:54, Robert Skedgell wrote: > > ref=legible_london > > I don't understand the rationale for this as a 'ref'. Refs are normally > unique identifiers for a particular object (unique within a particular > domain, that is). Thus each sign would have a different ref, if there > were indeed a system of refs for Legible London signs. The value > 'legible_london' looks more like a network tag.
ref=* was (as already stated in another reply) an error in my thinking/ recollection - something like brand=legible_london or network=legible_london would seem appropriate choices from the suggestions made. On closer inspection of a few of the miniliths in Stratford, they do have a unique ID number which would be an appropriate use for the ref key. -- Robert Skedgell (rskedgell) _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
