On Mon, 13 Jul 2020 at 11:04, Chris Fleming <m...@chrisfleming.org> wrote:
> The third issue is of copyright, which is the one Adam brought up. > Personally I don't really know about this one. On one hand the route is > made of of ways already existing on OpenStreetMap; does that move us a step > outside of copying from whatever data source was used to derive the route? > Provided none of those OSM features were added, imported, aligned, or otherwise with reference to the data source, then those pre-existing features themselves are not problematic. > > We also have copyright of the route itself, Cycling UK do seem to assert > copyright and therefore we probably do need them to ask them. (It's nice to > see that the cycling UK website does display the route over a OSM map) but > they link externally to OS maps. > ...and they may indeed have drawn up their data using OS mapping making it OS derived data. Kind regards, Adam
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
