Yes, either highway=footway or highway=cycleway are fine, and there's almost no difference if you're also tagging access rights explicitly! Thanks for being careful about it.
Dan Op za 21 nov. 2020 om 18:38 schreef Edward Bainton <bainton....@gmail.com>: > Thanks all for these ideas. The path is marked as shared, but only in the > middle of the park > <https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@52.5448007,-0.2770366,3a,75y,51.5h,82.26t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1s0-5dFjAe4D0GCEHPfxmw1A!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo0.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3D0-5dFjAe4D0GCEHPfxmw1A%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D174.08063%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i13312!8i6656> > - it's a bit odd. (It's even on a cross-city cycle route.) > > It's the actual highway=* tag that I was most puzzled over, but it sounds > like with the access tags this is academic for routing purposes. > > In which case it would seem the 'looks like a footway, rides like a > footway' criterion would be best? > > Not relevant here, but like Tony I also would love a tag that means > 'everyone cycles here, even if it's technically illegal'. I think it was > SK53 who suggested some use 'tolerated', which seems pretty good to me. > > > > On Sat, 21 Nov 2020 at 16:00, David Woolley <for...@david-woolley.me.uk> > wrote: > >> On 21/11/2020 15:46, Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-GB wrote: >> > there is also bicycle=permissive (based on access=permissive) for >> > "permitted right now but can be revoked/changed at any time" >> >> The way seems to be in a park, and, in general, permissive is the >> maximum legal status of any path in a park, unless it is also a >> bridleway or public footpath, in the definitive map. >> >> > >> > In general modelling "clearly illegal but accepted and normal" is >> > problematic >> > for access/parking tagging in OSM. >> > >> >> There is a modal filter near me, on a temporary traffic regulation >> order. It has been flouted for all the three months that it has >> existed. However it is clearly signed as emergency vehicles (and >> non-motor vehicles) only. In that case accepted use shouldn't represent >> how it is mapped. (It also has enforcement camera signs, and it might >> be interesting to find how many fines they collect if they do install >> the cameras. I suspect the abuse will stop until they are moved >> elsewhere.) >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-GB mailing list >> Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb >> > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb >
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
