https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=95
I personally think that it's not worth it to worry about those prohibitions, because North Koreans don't have that access to the internet anyways. The Forum might be a place though where some armchair mapper asks questions regarding mapping North Korea, so. Anyways, just a thought, not so important. Good we have that forum now, maybe a welcome post would be nice! (and something the search engines can index..)
On 2017년 03월 01일 03:31, 느림보 wrote:
I asked to open users: South Korea forum. I limited region to South Korea because un-authorized communication between people in South Korea and people in North Korea is prohibited in both Countries. 2017-03-01 10:41 GMT+09:00 느림보 <nri...@gmail.com <mailto:nri...@gmail.com>>: Opps, just Max said about interface language of mailman. I misunderstood his suggestion, so I just tried to describe barriers that I felt. (mailman and conversation language.) As 최규성 said I think interface language is not a big deal. 2017-02-28 23:23 GMT+09:00 Max <abonneme...@revolwear.com <mailto:abonneme...@revolwear.com>>: Well, that's another big discussion about mailinglists vs. other means of communication. Some people for example prefer forums over email lists. There is no "user: Korea" folder in the official osm forums https://forum.openstreetmap.org/ <https://forum.openstreetmap.org/> I'm not a fan of forums myself* so I am not volunteering to be admin for that, but maybe someone else here wants to ask for the creation of "users: Korea" there? *exept https://www.discourse.org that one I found pretty amazing On 2017년 02월 28일 13:35, 느림보 wrote: >From systematic view, I think two reasons made few Korean speaking members. One is clearly language. However, a mailing list itself would make it worse. I think a mailing list is one of the lease common communication system in my country. People might don’t know how to join and act in this system. It looks like foreign culture. (I don’t know, too. I tried to response some previous threads but I hesitated because I don’t know what is impolite attitude in a mailing list.) It might be very difficult to invite Korean contributors in this system, however more discussion in Korean might lead viewers into discussion. So strongly agree with this suggestion. 느림보 (Nrimbo) 2017-02-28 20:57 GMT+09:00 Max <abonneme...@revolwear.com <mailto:abonneme...@revolwear.com> <mailto:abonneme...@revolwear.com <mailto:abonneme...@revolwear.com>>>: Since there is no separate email list for the DPRK, that might be correct to use ko or am I missing something? On 2017년 02월 28일 12:26, Changwoo Ryu wrote: Actually "ko" is the ISO639 code for Korean language. ("kr" ISO3166 code for ROK.) 2017-02-28 19:02 GMT+09:00 Max <abonneme...@revolwear.com <mailto:abonneme...@revolwear.com> <mailto:abonneme...@revolwear.com <mailto:abonneme...@revolwear.com>>>: Looking through https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/ <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/> <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/ <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/>> I noticed that most of them have the interface in their respective language. talk-ko is in English though. (Not talking about the languag of the actual conversations, just the mailman interface) Could this be a reason for the few korean speaking members? Should this be changed? (I'd say yes) Any opinions, thoughts about it?
_______________________________________________ Talk-ko mailing list Talk-ko@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ko
