-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 26.01.2011 10:20, Michał Borsuk wrote: > Am 26.01.2011 08:43, schrieb Wojciech Kulesza: >> > >> > Just compare your relation with the working one :) >> > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/361959 >> > On first sight i'm wondering why you are mixing "railway=halt" and >> > "railway=tram_stop"? Isn't all of it a tram line? Additionally you are >> > missing "from=" and "to=" in your relation. >> > >> > Claudius >> >> This was maybe not clear from my first email. I was not the author of >> those relations. I simply used openstreetbrowser.org >> <http://openstreetbrowser.org> project to identify already-existing >> relations for trams/buses in Poznan/Poland and used them in that OSM API. >> >> Is there anything i can do in order to get them in the correct format? > > That's a mess! > > 1. Tram lines are normally represented by a single line on the map, not one > line > per track
Please don't delete information, which is more accurate but rendered - in your opinion - bad! If you think, this is wrong in your opinion, start to make a new rendering in Mapnik! > 2. Each route is represented by relation[s], so this > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/175610061 is completely wrong > > 3. Tram stops have the wrong tags > > I'd start with that... > > > Greetings, > > LMB - - Fips > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-transit mailing list > Talk-transit@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk1AMQUACgkQnHVyAFIfTkEY3wCfbZzuUjXHg9MVtWslHCK6v4Um 1sUAn3ns+5qtqzlZQ2TZmwtp9r+Lasds =klG/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Talk-transit mailing list Talk-transit@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit