Joseph Jon Booker wrote: > Also, wouldn't it make sense to have the way a route is displayed as > the name? For example, network=I,ref=90 would have name="I 90", and > network=US:IL, ref=58 would have name="IL 58" in the relations.
Not really, no. Many Interstate routes have official names that have nothing to do with their status or route number: See Pacific Highway, Golden State Freeway, and Baldock Freeway to name a few (and that's just I-5!) _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
