Apollinaris Schoell wrote: > this is nice, will add what I have done already. > > some comments for discussion. > did you change the recommendation for a reason compared to the one here? > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States_roads_tagging > not that this is perfect but it has more information. > > both definitions should be consistent and correct a few things. a list > of corrections I would like. > - with API 0.6 the size of relations is limited to 1000 members. many > interstates have more segments. relations have to be split into > smaller pieces and a "super" relation.
Ouch! Who failed CS120? You should never arbitrarily set the maximum, zero-one-infinity should be the rule when picking upper bounds... _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us