Ian Dees writes: > The moment it makes its way in to OSM it becomes incorrect. There is > *absolutely* no way to improve the data once it's in OSM, so it should not > be in OSM. Period.
That's a great theory, but I don't think many people subscribe to it. Of course anybody can improve on imported data by tagging it, even if its location is already perfect in every way, which, being a database created by humans, is not even remotely likely. There is no point in having this discussion again unless you're going to bring up something new. So far, not. OSM is a big tent with room for lots of data and lots of opinions. You're welcome to express yours, but you're not welcome to claim it is or should be the ruling opinion. -- --my blog is at http://blog.russnelson.com Crynwr supports open source software 521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315-600-8815 Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | Sheepdog _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us