On 31/08/2020 10.54, Greg Troxel wrote:
Matthew Woehlke writes:
*You* may see it this way. The rest of the community does not.
A declaration that every other member of the community disagrees is
unreasonable.
I'm not sure if this is directed at me or at Mike. If at me, I'll point
out that the fact we're having this conversation in the first place is
because someone strongly disagrees with residential driveways being
access=private "by default". Nor is it the first time I've encountered
that opinion.
Honestly, my initial opinion on the matter was closer to Mike's, but
others told me I was wrong.
B) private shopping centers where the public is welcome, to shop.
(access=customers, mostly)
C) private land where use is known acceptable (access=permissive)
Even this is not clear. *My* understanding is that most businesses are
closer to access=permissive, with access=customers referring more to
places that are explicitly signed as "customers only". In most shopping
centers, for example, it seems acceptable to go there just to walk
around even with no intention of purchasing anything. (At least, I know
that people do so...)
--
Matthew
_______________________________________________
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
