On 10/01/2008, Abigail Brady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jan 10, 2008 11:06 AM, Lester Caine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Stephen Gower wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 10:11:35PM +1300, Robin Paulson wrote: > > >> the boundary data should be relatively easy to come by > > > > > > Not where it isn't marked on the ground, and is only defined by > > > reference to the Copyrighted national mapping. The is the case in > > > many places in the UK. > > > > AND it is changed each year or so by the Boundary Commission :) > > > > Administrative boundary changes (as opposed to electoral ones) are in fact > relatively rare and usually make boundaries follow more easily identified > features (for example, the external border of Greater London in many places > now follows the M25, as opposed to the line of nearby ancient hedges which > may or not be there any more). > > -- > Abi > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk > > Is Greater London debatable or for a mapping/administritive meaning are you counting the outside boundaries of the London Boroughs?
I personally do it by the London Transport zone, as your generally need a 10-12minute bus service so it feels like London. By friends in the next suburb define Greater London by the M25, which would include them and lots of fields. -- Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.livingwithdragons.com
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
