-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: | On Feb 3, 2008 1:49 PM, Bruce Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: |>> What does the separate object type gain us exactly, apart from more code |>> to maintain? |> There are many issues with notes in the actual data: |> |> * It's not anything to do with the actual feature being mapped. |> * It adds to the complexity of the data. (not really a problem) |> * It wouldn't be possible to do more complex things like reviewing |> a notes. | | I think we have a pretty good analogy here: we could ask people to | submit bugs by committing comments to the relevent parts of SVN.
Only if they knew where in the code the bug was. And if they did, they could just fix it and not report the bug. This is different, because when somone is pointing to an error in a map, that only makes sense in the context of where the error is. If they want to post a bug and they don't know where it is (perhaps "I can't find the city of [nnn] on the map"), then that probably would go in trac. Robert (Jamie) Munro -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHqHtsz+aYVHdncI0RAi5iAJ0ThjhjrIR21aMTZ0ZcP5pLC9qMpgCg8sRq LGsUC92crYr3580R3TtRoF8= =v20G -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
