On 8 Feb 2008, at 19:12, David Groom wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Artem Pavlenko" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "David Earl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: "David Groom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "talk Openstreetmap" > <talk@openstreetmap.org> > Sent: Friday, February 08, 2008 12:24 PM > Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Large Rivers in general, mapnik rendering > in Particular > > >> >> On 8 Feb 2008, at 12:05, David Earl wrote: >> >>> On 08/02/2008 11:54, David Groom wrote: >>>> You mean like >>>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Relations/Proposed/ >>>> Rivers, which >>>> would be my ideal, >>> >>> Ah, yes. >>> >>> I was suggesting putting in the connections across the river as >>> well, >>> but there isn't any reason why if the renderer is building its own >>> polygon from the relation that it can't imply a connection from >>> the end >>> of each way to the start of the other. >>> >>> Allowing more than one contiguous way on each bank would also be >>> useful. >> >> >>> I'll edit the wiki. >> >> Could you put some visual examples, please? > > Artem, what i had in mind is now shown on http:// > wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Relations/Proposed/Rivers > > David G
Yep, we can live with this. Artem > >>> >>> David >> >> Artem >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> talk mailing list >>> talk@openstreetmap.org >>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk >> > > _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk