Sven Geggus wrote: > Cartinus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> But you don't have to suggest this now. ;) Proposals for both already >> existed >> in the wiki before Hawke wrote the railway=incline proposal. > > So let us break down the different suggestions and go on vor vote > now? > > As far as I can tell, there are two suggestions: > > 1.) adding railway=funicular and rag=yes for non funicular incline > railways > > 2.) adding railway=incline and an additional tags for types of incline > railways (funicular,rag, ...)
I think it is important to be able to mark a railway as an incline railway of some sort, without having to specify what drive mechanism it uses. If that can fit into the first suggestion, I'm all for it. -Alex Mauer "hawke"
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
