On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 11:22 AM, Nic Roets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Isn't a motorway by definition divided and therefore oneway ? > > My opinion is that motorway and motorway_link must both default to > oneway=true, as the bi-directional varieties are non-existent / very rare.
I agree on the motorway, but around here it is very common to have motorway_links that are partially oneway, but then merge in an oneway=no before joining other roads e.g. |\ | L R M \ | W =--L2---+ | / | | L R |/ where MW is the motorway (one direction only), L are two oneway motorway links (entry and exit respectively), R is some kind of non-motorway road and L2 is a two-way part of motorway_link of course in most of these cases you need either a oneway=yes tag on the L parts or a oneway=no tag on the L2 part, so having either default is going to require some explicit tagging. On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 12:22 PM, Lester Caine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Marc Schütz wrote: >> Quite the opposite: most motorway_links around here a bidirectional, except >> the small parts where they enter and exit the motorway. > Then only the small parts that are the actual link should be tagged as > motorway_links ;) in the example above, the motorway ending sign would be at the end of L2, not at the end of the L parts, so driving rules for motorway links would apply and motorway_link would be the logical tag -- Elena of Valhalla homepage: http://www.trueelena.org email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
