2009/1/31 Peter Vitt <pe...@dotnetphen.com>: > Hello List, > > On talk-de we had a discussion about relations, especially routes, and > roundabouts the other day. > > The topic was: How to integrate a roundabout into a relation. > > For now we have three different approaches: > 1) Leave the roundabout untouched (closed way) and integrate it completely > into > the relation.
Applies when the whole roundabout is a part of the route, mostly when the route is for road users, > 2) Leave the relation untouched (closed way) and _don't_ integrate it into the > relation. Just wrong. > 3) Split the roundabout as needed, integrate all parts of it into a dedicated > roundabout-relation and only the needed parts into the route. A roundabout relation - what would be the point in this, it doesn't add much more to the data than can already be inferred from the tagging (junction=roundabout) and the topology of the ways. > > As far as we weren't able to make a decision I want some more input from the > whole community, at best a description for the appropriate way to do it. > > Greets, Peter > 2009/1/31 Marc Schütz <schue...@gmx.net>: > 4) Split the roundabout as needed, tag all parts as junction=roundabout (don't > use a roundabout relation), and add only the needed parts into the route. Sounds like the best option... -- Regards, Thomas Wood (Edgemaster) _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
